In an incomplete order, the tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the appellant's puisiquestay application. The matter was listed for hearing in December 2017. No substantive legal proposition or final decision on merits is recorded in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3708/IDR/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1888/IDR/2017
United Bank of India … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Ms. Pooja Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. N. K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 03.10.2017
FPA-PMLA-1888/IDR/2017
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. One final opportunity is granted to file the reply within three weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
List this matter on 22nd December, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 03rd October, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1888/IDR/2017
Page 1 of 1
United Bank of India
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Justice Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
