The Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal and an interpleader application for final disposal. Both parties were directed to file the application reply and written synopsis before the next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3680/DLI/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1869/DLI/2017
Ashish Kumar … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Dr. Shamsuddin, Advocate & Ms. Priyanka Raj, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Advocate, on behalf of Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 18.09.2017
FPA-PMLA-1868/DLI/2017
In the appeal as well as in the application reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List the appeal for final disposal on 09th November, 2017.
Both the parties will file the written synopsis till the next date of hearing. The operation of the impugned order dated 05th June, 2017 shall remain stayed. The seizure order of jewellery shall continue, however the respondent shall not take the possession of the jewellery and disposed of the same till the next date.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 18th September, 2017 ‘A’ FPA-PMLA-1869/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for interim stay against the impugned orders under FEMA/PMLA should be allowed.
Ashish Kumar
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
