The Tribunal disposed of an adjournment plea sought by the respondent in a prevention of money laundering matter, noting lack of opposition and proceeding to list the case for the next date via a one-line order devoid of substantive legal principles.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3611/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1840/CHN/2017
S. Nirmala … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Nitendra Kumar, D.A. For the Respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 18.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1840/CHN/2017
Adjournment is sought on behalf of the respondent which is not
opposed by the learned counsel for the appellant.
List on 27th September, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
18th August, 2017
M
FPA-PMLA-1840/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
S. Nirmala
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
