Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1833/DLI/2017 of Sanjay Jain & Rajiv Jain v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

ATFP25 Aug 2017FPA-PMLA-1833/DLI/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Order receiving an appeal against an Adjudicating Authority award. The court lists an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal and requests the respondent to file a reply within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Application for condonation of delay listed; deadline fixed for respondent to file reply.

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-1833/DLI/2017 of Sanjay Jain & Rajiv Jain v/s The Deputy… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3593/DLI/2017 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-3594/DLI/2017 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1833/DLI/2017

¶3

Sanjay Jain & Rajiv Jain

¶4

… Appellant/Applicant

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent

¶7

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶8

For the appellant	: Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate Shri Vijay Aggarwal, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER

¶9

ORDER 25.08.2017

¶10

MP-PMLA-3594/DLI/2017 (COD) & FPA-PMLA-1833/DLI/2017

¶11

The present appeal has been filed by appellant u/s 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 14^th March, 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority in O.C. 664/2017.

¶12

Alongwith the appeal, an application for condonation of 75 days delay in filing the appeal has been filed. The prayer is opposed by the learned counsel for the Respondent and seeks time to file the Reply to the application. Let the same be filed within two weeks with an advance copy

¶13

FPA-PMLA-1833/DLI/2017

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder, if any, within two weeks thereafter.

¶16

List this application for hearing on 5^th October, 2017.

¶17

(Justice Manmohan Singh)

¶18

Chairman