Listing order adjourning the reply to the appeal for six weeks and permitting the respondent to file it with an advance copy for the appellant to file a rejoinder.
The Tribunal did not adjudicate the merits of the appeal but instructed the respondent to file the reply within six weeks. The matter is listed for further proceedings subject to the filing of the reply and rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1827/CHN/2017 P. Suresh Kumar … Appellants/Applicants Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : Shri Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mayank Jain, Adv. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Parmatma Singh, Advocate | |
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 21.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1827/CHN/2017
Reply to the appeal has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to respondent to file the same within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who may file the rejoinder on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 6th February, 2018.
FPA-PMLA-1827/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 2
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the application for filing the additional documents is ready and he would be filing the same during the course of the day.
As and when the said application is filed, the same will be considered on merits.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 21st August, 2017.
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1827/CHN/2017
Page 2 of 2
P. Suresh Kumar
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
