Appellant directed Enforcement ombudsman to fix reply time for respondent and list appeal for February 21, 2018. No merits decided.
Procedural order in money laundering appeal. Ombudsman allowed time for reply and subsequent rejoinder. Matter listed for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3535/KOL/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1806/KOL/2017 Shri Deo Dayal Chand … Appellant/Applicant Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata Versus M/s Dileep S. Mehta & Company … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared For the appellant : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Sanjay Jha, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 22.09.2017 FPA-PMLA-1806/KOL/2017
The respondent is served. Shri Sanjay Jha, learned counsel for the respondent, seeks time to file the Vakalatnama and reply. Let the same be done within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List this appeal on 21st February, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 22nd September, 2017 ‘A’ FPA-PMLA-1806/KOL/2017
Page 1 of 1
Shri Deo Dayal Chand
M/s Dileep S. Mehta & Company
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
