The Appellate Tribunal, PMLA, disposed of a fresh application condoning delay in filing an appeal. The matter regarding a stay application and an order about a status quo notice was listed for subsequent hearing.
The application for condonation of delay (MP-PMLA-1800/KOL/2017) was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3689/KOL/2017 (COD) MP-PMLA-3528/KOL/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1800/KOL/2017
Toushif Biswas … Appellant
Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Farook M. Razack, Sr. Advocate Shri Faisal Farook, Advocate Shri Subhail Farook, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| ORDER 10.08.2017 |
|---|
FPA-PMLA-1800/KOL/2017, MP-PMLA-3689/KOL/2017 (COD) & MPPMLA-3528/KOL/2017 (Stay)
In view of the last order the fresh application has been filed explaining the entire position. The learned counsel for the respondent after having gone through the application does not oppose the delay in filing the appeal. In view of the averments made in the application the delay is condoned. The application for condontion of delay i.e. MP-PMLA3689/KOL/2017 (COD) is disposed of.
FPA-PMLA-1800/KOL/2017
Page 1 of 2
Replies to the stay application and appeal be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinders within four weeks thereafter.
Mr. Tripathi, the learned counsel for the respondent has informed us that the respondent was not aware about the passing of status quo order dated 6th July, 2017 and probably the status quo order was typed in the present appeal due to oversight. He submits that since the respondent was not aware of the status quo order, the possession of few properties have been taken even the notice under section 8(4) has been issued in the matter.
List on 23rd November, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi,
10th August, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1800/KOL/2017
Page 2 of 2
Toushif Biswas
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
