Procedural notation by the Prevention of Money Laundering Act Appellate Tribunal handling two appeals (one for exemption). The court adjourned after the reply was filed, granted time for the rejoinder, and listed the matter for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3491/COCHIN/2017 (Exem.)
&
FPA-PMLA-1788/COCHIN/2017
Shakkeela T … Appellant
Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Ramesh Babu, Advocate & Shri Radha Krishnan, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 22.11.2017
FPA-PMLA-1788/COCHIN/2017
Reply has been filed by the respondent. Copy has been handed over to the learned counsel for the appellant today itself who seeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks. Both the parties will file the written synopsis.
List on 23rd April, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 22nd November, 2017 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1788/COCHIN/2017
Page 1 of 1
Shakkeela T
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
