The Appeal Tribunal set dates for filing replies, synopses, and final argument in an appeal arising under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
The matter was listed for final argument on 6th October, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEYLAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1781/CHD/2017
M/s Prakash Industries
… Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rohit Chaudhary, Advocate For the respondent : Shri A.K. Tripathi, Adocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
06.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1781/CHD/2017
Issue notice. Let the reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder thereafter.
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
List for final argument on 6th October, 2017
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi,
6th July, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1781/CHD/2017
Page 1 of 1
M/s Prakash Industries
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
