The Appellate Tribunal granted the appellant/final opportunity to file a reply statement within four weeks in the referenced money laundering appeal, postponing the disposal.
Allotted final opportunity to file a reply in the specified timeframe.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1744/CHN/2017
Shri K. Velusamy
… Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : S. Beno Beneigar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
10.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1744/CHN/2017
Reply in the appeal has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 6th November, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
10th August, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1744/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
Shri K. Velusamy
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
