This order repeats that the reply was not filed and an interim order to continue is issued. Procedures for filing copies and rejoinders were scheduled for later dates in 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3369/CHD/2017 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-3370/CHD/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1742/CHD/2017
Vijay Kumar Kushwaha & Ors. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director, … Respondent Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri. Khalil A. Ansari, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri N. K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 03.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1742/CHD/2017
Reply has not been filed. Mr. N. K. Matta, learned counsel for the respondent states that scanned copies have been received and he would be filing the same within two weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter. Copy of the reply and interim application have been handed over to the learned counsel for the appellant.
List on 22nd December, 2017.
Interim Order to Continue.
Copy of the order be given ‘dasti’ to both the parties.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 03rd August, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1742/CHD/2017
Page 1 of 1
Vijay Kumar Kushwaha
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
