FPA-PMLA-1740/MUM/2017 of Diageo Holdings Netherlands B.V. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Order fixing timelines for reply and rejoinder in an ad-interim application. No substantive decision or reasoning recorded in this order.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1740/MUM/2017
DIAGEO Holdings Netherlands B.V. … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Mohit Auluck, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 07.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1740/MUM/2017
Reply has not been filed. Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate, states that reply is ready and he would be filing the same within two weeks. The same be filed within two weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
DIAGEO Holdings Netherlands B.V.
- respondent
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · July
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1740/MUM/2017
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court