The Appellate Tribunal dealt with a fresh appeal regarding adjournment and a request for interim order to maintain status quo in attached properties. The matter was adjourned to 12 May 2017 without hearing merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3365/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1736/MUM/2017
63 Moons Technologies Ltd.
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : | Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate Mr. Ankur Saigal, Advocate Mr. Himanshu Satija, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : | Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate On behalf of Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
|---|---|
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 09.05.2017
MP-PMLA-3365/MUM/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1736/MUM/2017
A fresh appeal has been filed Under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 09th March, 2017. Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate has informed that Mr. S.A. Saud who is the main counsel and is out of station, therefore the matter is adjourned for one week. The Learned Counsel for the appellant on the other hand is pressing for Interim Order. He submits that in case the matter is adjourned the respondent will take the possession of the properties. The Learned Counsel for the appellant has also referred the order dated 18th April, 2016 passed by the Supreme Court in SLP (C) Nos. 1162711628/2016 @ CC 5726-5727/2016 particularly Para 8 of the order. Since Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate is not available, list this matter on 12th
FPA-PMLA-1736/MUM/2017 Page 1 of 2
May, 2017 at 02:30 PM without going into the merits of the case till the next date of hearing. Both parties should maintain the ‘ status quo’ in relation to the attached properties.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
New Delhi,
09th May, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1736/MUM/2017 Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant interim order maintaining status quo in attached properties pending final hearing due to respondent counsel unavailability.
63 Moons Technologies Ltd.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
