Appellate Tribunal admitted an appeal challenging an order under the PMLA and a stay application. Notice was issued to the respondent in both matters. Liberty was granted for interim relief.
Notice issued to respondent for reply; liberty granted to appellant for interim order in stay matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3359/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1731/BNG/2017
Shri Rahul … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Shaiesh Madiyal, Advocate Shri Mahesh Thakur, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
11.05.2017
FPA-PMLA-1731/BNG/2017
The appellant has filed the present appeal u/s 26 of PML Act 2002 challenging the order dated 23rd February, 2017. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent and accept the notice. Let the reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 28th September, 2017
MP-PMLA-3359/BNG/2017 (Stay)
Issue notice to the respondent. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that Hon’ble Karnataka High Court at Banglore has FPA-PMLA-1731/BNG/2017 Page 1 of 2
passed the order in favour of the appellant. Photocopy of the order is filed by the appellant and same is taken on record. Therefore, he is not pressing any interim order at this stage. Liberty is granted to the appellant to move the application if necessary to press the interim order at any stage.
Reply be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 28th September, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra)
Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 11th May, 2017
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1731/BNG/2017
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to challenge the order dated 23rd February, 2017 under u/s 26 of PMLA 2002
Whether to grant interim order in the stay application
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Rahul
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
