FPA-PMLA-1724/JP/2017 of Mrs. Lata Mangal v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Case brief
What is this about?
Mrs. Lata Mangal V/s The Deputy Director…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3346/JP/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1724/JP/2017
Mrs. Lata Mangal … Appellant/Applicant Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri T. Sundar Ramanathan, Adv. Ms. Evneet Uppal, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripahti, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 11.05.2017
FPA-PMLA-1724/JP/2017
The appellant has filed the present appeal u/s 26 of PML Act 2002 challenging the order dated 20th February, 2017. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent accepts the notice and seeks time to file the reply. Reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 21st September, 2017
FPA-PMLA-1724/JP/2017
Page 1 of 2
MP-PMLA-3346/JP/2017 (Stay)
Alongwith the present appeal an application for stay of operation of the impugned order has been filed. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that no notice u/s 8(4) for possession of the property has been received from the respondent. As and when any notice is received by the appellant from the respondent for taking possession of the property the appellant may mention the matter and press the interim prayer which will be considered on merits. In case notice u/s 8(4) of PMLA is issued by the respondent, a copy of the notice shall also be served to the counsel for the appellant.
In the meanwhile respondent is given liberty to file the reply within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 21st September, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 11th May, 2017 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1724/JP/2017
Page 2 of 2
Mrs. Lata Mangal
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court