This order directed the IO to bring records, ordered both parties to file a chronology of events, and mandated adherence to their subsequent list hearing schedule.
IO to bring records; parties to file chronology; order to be sealed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3583/MUM/2017 (Misc) MP-PMLA-3328/MUM/2017 (COD) MP-PMLA-3229/MUM/2017 (Exem.)
&
FPA-PMLA-1716/MUM/2017
M/s Hindavi Swarajya Trading Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Yogesh Ravi, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Rajeev Avasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 11.08.2017
MP-PMLA-3328/MUM/2017 (COD)
In the application for condonation of delay, some arguments have been addressed on behalf of appellant’s counsel who wishes to file the present status of the attached properties in question. The I.O. to bring the records on the next date. Both the parties to file the list of dates and sequence of events on or before the next date of hearing.
FPA-PMLA-1716/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 2
List on 06th September, 2017.
Copy of the order be given ‘dasti’ to both the parties.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 11th August, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1716/MUM/2017
Page 2 of 2
M/s Hindavi Swarajya Trading Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
