The Tribunal listed an adjournment petition for hearing on a future date due to counsel's unavailability. The court did not dispose of the underlying case in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3403/DLI/2017 (Exem.)
&
FPA-PMLA-1700/DLI/2017
Amit Chaturvedi … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate, Shri Shivansh Gupta, Advocate, Shri Vijay Agarwal, Advocate & Shri Vishal Bhardwaj, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : |
CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
| ORDER | ||
| 21.12.201 | 7 |
FPA-PMLA-1700/DLI/2017
An adjournment is sought on behalf of the appellant as counsel is
busy in some other matter.
List these matters on 21st March, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 21st December, 2017 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1700/DLI/2017 Page 1 of 1
Amit Chaturvedi
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
