The matter mentions an appeal filed in the Prevention of Money Laundering Act before the Appellate Tribunal at New Delhi. The order notices an appeal and sets dates for reply, rejoinder, and listing. No substantive legal proposition is decided in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1699/DLI/2017 HB Chaturvedi & Ors. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate Shri Mudit Jain, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 21.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1699/DLI/2017
Reply to the appeal has been filed by the respondent. Rejoinder, if
any, be filed within four weeks. Since the connected matters are coming up on 21.12.2017, this matter may also be listed on 21.12.2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 21st July, 2017
‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1699/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
HB Chaturvedi & Ors.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
