The order is a procedural direction in a PMLA appeal, setting a time limit for appending rejoinders and listing the matter for the future. No substantive decision or issue was resolved in this brief order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3398/DLI/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1694/DLI/2017
Kotwan Traders Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate Shri Mudit Jain, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 21.07.2017 FPA-PMLA-1694/DLI/2017
Reply to the appeal and stay application has been filed by the learned Counsel for the respondent. The learned Counsel for the appellant seeks time to file the rejoinders. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 21st December, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 21st July, 2017
‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1694/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Kotwan Traders Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
