The appellate tribunal adjourned the appeal in the money laundering proceeding at respondent's request due to advocate unavailability.
The matter was adjourned pending the availability of counsel. No substantive ruling or legal principle was laid down in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1693/Jaipur/2017
Surendra Kumar Sharma … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate For the respondent : Sh. Neeraj Atri, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 15.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1693/Jaipur/2017
The matter is adjourned at the request of Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate
as Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate is not available today.
List on 16th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 15th March, 2017. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1693/Jaipur/2017
Page 1 of 1
Surendra Kumar Sharma
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
