Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1686/CHN/2017 of D. Senthil v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

ATFP21 Mar 2017FPA-PMLA-1686/CHN/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Anti-Money Laundering Tribunal noted that an appeal and stay application were pending. The appellant sought an interim order regarding a specific residential property subject to attachment. The Tribunal listed both the appeal and the stay application for hearing on 31st July, 2017.

What did the court decide?

The appeal, stay application, and eviction order were listed for hearing on 31st July, 2017. A notice was issued for the eviction order.

FPA-PMLA-1686/CHN/2017 of D. Senthil v/s The Deputy Director… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3248/CHN/2017 MP-PMLA-3249/CHN/2017 (Stay) &

¶3

FPA-PMLA-1686/CHN/2017

¶4

D. Senthil

¶5

… Appellant/Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent

¶8

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶9

For the appellant	: Shri B. Kumar, Advocate Shri Naveen Malhotra, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA	: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	: MEMBER

¶10

ORDER 21.03.2017

¶11

MP-PMLA-3249/CHN/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1686/CHN/2017

¶12

The appellant Smt. S. Kumari has filed the present appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering against the impunged order dated 03^rd February, 2017. The appellant submits that the appellant has also received the notice of eviction notice under Section 8(4) of the Act. Issue notice. Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate accepts the notice. He seeks time to file the replies within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinders four weeks thereafter.

¶13

List the appeal and stay application on 31^st July, 2017.

¶14

FPA-PMLA-1686/CHN/2017

¶15

Page 1 of 3

¶16

MP-PMLA-3248/CHN/2017

¶17

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant is pressing for interim order only in relation to the one of the residential property as item 66. The detail of the same is mentioned below:

¶18

No. 54, Sevilimedu Village, under the jurisidiction of Joint Sub Registrar-II, Registration Sub-District, Kanchipuram Taluk, Kanchipuram- Door No. 13, Plot No. 21 in new Survey No. 7/1B5B in the present Patta No. 1822, admeasuring 1500 sq. ft. and situated in Ellappa Nagar, Sevilimedu Village.

¶19

The counsel is appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that it is a residential house in which the appellant and his family are residing. The appellant undertakes not to dispose of or alienate the said property till the further directions are issued by this Tribunal. He further submits that at the time of hearing of the application if this Tribunal directs the appellant to deposit the certain amount towards rent he will do the same. Subject to above, parties to maintain Status quo in relation to property No. 66 i.e. No. 54, Sevilimedu Village, under the jurisidiction of Joint Sub Registrar-II, Registration Sub-District, Kanchipuram Taluk, Kanchipuram- Door No. 13, Plot No. 21 in new Survey No. 7/1B5B in the present Patta No. 1822, admeasuring 1500 sq. ft. and situated in Ellappa Nagar, Sevilimedu Village.

¶20

Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate learned counsel for the respondent submits that the additional affidavit has been filed by the appellant. Alongwith the affidavits, certain documents have also been filed which is not part and parcel of the record of the Adjudicating Authority. The said affidavit will only be considered after hearing the parties.

¶21

Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that alongwith the reply, the respondent, after verification about FPA-PMLA-1686/CHN/2017 Page 2 of 3

¶22

Page 2 of 3

¶23

the rental value of the said property, will file the valuation certificate so that at the time of the said application, the said aspect will also be considered.

¶24

List this application for 31^st July, 2017.

¶25

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶26

(Kaushal Srivastava) Member

(Anand Kishore)

Member

New Delhi,

21^st March, 2017

¶31

‘A’

¶32

FPA-PMLA-1686/CHN/2017

¶33

Page 3 of 3

FPA-PMLA-1686/CHN/2017 of D. Senthil v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1686/CHN/2017 of D. Senthil v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases