This order sets a timeline for filing a reply to a motion or application. No substantive legal issue or decision was provided in the text.
The respondent was granted six weeks to file a reply with an advance copy to the appellant, who may then file a rejoinder within four weeks. The matter was listed for a future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3197/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3198/HYD/2017 (A.D.) &
FPA-PMLA-1672/HYD/2017
Nidhi Agencies … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Dr. S. V. Rama Krishna, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 20.09.2017
FPA-PMLA-1672/HYD/2017
Reply has not been filed. Learned counsel for the respondent seeks more time to file the same. Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 15th March, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 20th September, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1672/HYD/2017
Page 1 of 1
Nidhi Agencies
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
