A short order extending time for the appellant to file a rejoinder in a Prevention of Money Laundering Act matter. The case was listed for further proceedings.
Time granted for filing rejoinder within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3207/COCHIN/2017 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-1667/ COCHIN /2017
Rajesh K … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri N.P. Rakesh Panicker, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 13.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1667/COCHIN/2017
Reply has been filed. Counsel for the appellant seeks time to file the
rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 06th November, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 13th July, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1667/COCHIN/2017
Page 1 of 1
Rajesh K
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
MANMOHAN SINGH
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
