The Appellate Tribunal allowed time for filing replies to a notice in the pending appeal and applications under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3172/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3173/HYD/2017 (A.D.) &
FPA-PMLA-1653/HYD/2017
Sri Thirupathi Balaji Oils
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri P. Prasad, Advocate
For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 06.03.2017
MP-PMLA-3172/HYD/2017 (Stay), MP-PMLA-3173/HYD/2017 (A.D.) & FPA-PMLA-1653/HYD/2017
Issue notice in the Appeal as well as in the above Applications. Mr. Vikas Garg, the learned Counsel for the Respondent accepts notice and seeks time to file replies. Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned Counsel for the Appellant who may file the rejoinders within four weeks thereafter.
List on 8th May, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 6th March, 2017 ‘R’
FPA-PMLA-1653/HYD/2017
Page 1 of 1
Sri Thirupathi Balaji Oils
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Justice Manmohan Singh
Shri Kaushal Srivastava
Shri Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
