Directions to the respondent to file a reply and grant the appellant four weeks time to file a rejoinder. Matters adjourned.
Rearg to file reply; appellant granted four weeks to file rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1646/CHN/2017
M.Hema … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Prasad Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
28.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1646/CHN/2017
The learned counsel for the respondent submits that he would be filing the reply in the registry during the course of the day. Copy has been served to the learned counsel to the appellant who seeks four weeks time to file the rejoinder.
List on 22nd February, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 28th August, 2017. ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1646/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
M.Hema
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
