Appeal regarding a freezing order application under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The tribunal noted the reply to the appeal was not filed and listed the matter adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3128/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1634/MUM/2017
United Breweries (Holdings) Ltd.
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Guru Krishnan Kumar, Sr. Adv. Shri Munjaal Bhatt, Advocate Mr. Himanshu, Advocate
For the respondent : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 21.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1634/MUM/2017
Reply to the appeal has not been filed though reply to possession
notice issued u/s 8(4) of the Act i.e. application for stay has been filed. Let
the rejoinder be filed within two weeks.
List on 15th November, 2017.
In the meanwhile liberty is also granted to the respondent to file the
reply to the appeal within three weeks.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 21st August, 2017. ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1634/MUM/2017 Page 1 of 1
United Breweries (Holdings) Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
