Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1626/ CHN/2017 of S. Mahesh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

ATFP3 May 2017FPA-PMLA-1626/ CHN/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appellate Tribunal in Prevention of Money Laundering Act proceedings. Appellants claimed compliance via deposit of amount. Liberty granted to file rejoinder and written synopsis. Appeals disposed of with interim order continuation.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file rejoinder and written synopsis; interim order to continue during pendency; matters disposed of.

FPA-PMLA-1626/ CHN/2017 of S. Mahesh v/s The Deputy Director… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3106/CHN/2017 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-1624/CHN/2017 S. Ramesh Pothy … Appellant MP-PMLA-3107/CHN/2017 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-1625/ CHN/2017 S. Ashok … Appellant MP-PMLA-3108/CHN/2017 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-1626/ CHN/2017 S . Mahesh … Appellant MP-PMLA-3109/CHN/2017 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-1627/ CHN/2017 M/s Pothys Pvt. Ltd . … Appellant MP-PMLA-3110/CHN/2017 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-1628/ CHN/2017 S. Murugesh … Appellant MP-PMLA-3111/CHN/2017 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-1629/ CHN/2017 Ashwanth Pothy … Appellant MP-PMLA-3112/CHN/2017 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-1630/ CHN/2017 S. Pothiraj … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the appellant	:	Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Advocate Shri Omprakash, Advocate Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate
For the respondent	:	Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam for Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA	: :	CHAIRMAN MEMBER
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	:	MEMBER

¶5

ORDER 03.05.2017

¶6

FPA-PMLA-1624/CHN/2017, FPA-PMLA-1625/ CHN/2017 FPA-PMLA-1626/ CHN/2017, FPA-PMLA-1627/ CHN/2017

¶7

FPA-PMLA-1624 to 1630/CHN/2017

¶8

Page 1 of 2

¶9

FPA-PMLA-1628/ CHN/2017, FPA-PMLA-1629/ CHN/2017 FPA-PMLA-1630/ CHN/2017.

¶10

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the last order has been complied with as the appellant has deposited the amount. The reply has been filed by the respondent.

¶11

List on 20^th July, 2017.

¶12

In the meanwhile liberty is granted to the appellant to file the rejoinder, if so required. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis. Interim order to continue during the pendency of the appeal. MP is accordingly disposed off.

¶13

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶14

(Kaushal Srivastava) Member

¶15

(Anand Kishore) Member

New Delhi,

3^rd May, 2017.

‘K’

FPA-PMLA-1624 to 1630/CHN/2017

¶20

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1626/ CHN/2017 of S. Mahesh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1626/ CHN/2017 of S. Mahesh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases