The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant's request for an extension to file vakalatnamu, listing the matter for a future date. No substantive merits were addressed.
Vakalatnama was not filed yet; time was granted to file it by the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3102/BNG/2017 (STAY) FPA-PMLA-1621/BNG/2017
Smt. Basavarajeshwari
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rudro Chatterjee, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate for ED. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 27.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-1621/BNG/2017
Vakalatanama has not been filed by the counsel for the appellant;
he seeks some more time to file the same. He may do so on or before the
next date.
List on 3rd August, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 27th April, 2017. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1621/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 1
Smt. Basavarajeshwari
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
