Parties in a Final Revision Appeal under the PMLA were ordered to submit Vakalatnama and written synopsis; matter listed for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3120/JL/2017 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-3121/JL/2017 (U/s 35) MP-PMLA-3066/JL/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1605/JL/2017 Rajeev Jain … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Aman Kochhar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Mohammad Faraz, Advocate. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 18.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1605/JL/2017
The new counsel Sh. Aman Kochhar hired by the appellant has not filed the Vakalatnama. Let the same be filed at the first instance within one week. Both the parties are also allowed to file the written synopsis.
List the appeal on 21st December, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi,
18th August, 2017
M
FPA-PMLA-1605/JL/2017
Page 1 of 1
Rajeev Jain
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
