The tribunal listed the application for an adjournment to file the reply by the respondent. The application was allowed to be filed within three weeks.
Reply to be filed within three weeks; rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3053/DLI/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1597/DLI/2017 Mr. Deepak Gayal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant : | Shri A.T. Patra, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent : |
Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : |
CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA : |
MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL : |
MEMBER |
| ORDER 04.05.201 |
7 |
FPA-PMLA-1597/DLI/2017
Shri Vikas Garg, learned counsel for the respondent seeks some more time to file the reply. Let the same be filed within three weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 25th August, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 4th May, 2017 ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-1597/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent requires additional time to file the reply to the appellant's application.
Deepak Gayal
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
B.K. BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
