FPA-PMLA-1593/ PTN/2016 of Smt. Sindhu Devi v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

ATFP27 Apr 2017FPA-PMLA-1593/ PTN/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal noted the absence of a rejoinder and accepted the appellant's submission that pleadings were complete. The Tribunal listed the matter for hearing and clarified that a pending interim prayer regarding a notice under section 8(4) would be decided on merits only after receiving the official notice.

What the court decided

AI extract

FPA-PMLA-1593/ PTN/2016 of Smt. Sindhu Devi v/s The Deputy… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3019/PTN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1593/ PTN/2016 Smt. Sindhu Devi … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the appellant	: Shri Rajesh Mahale, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam for Mr. Shijan C. George, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER
SHRI B.K. BANSAL	: MEMBER

¶5

ORDER 27.04.2017

¶6

FPA-PMLA-1593/ PTN/2016

¶7

Rejoinder has not been filed by the counsel for the appellant. The counsel for the appellant submits that the same is not necessary. Thus the pleadings are complete. Both the parties are given six weeks time to file the written synopsis.

¶8

List on 15^th September, 2017.

¶9

The learned counsel for the appellant is pressing for interim order for which the separate MP 3019/2016 has been filed. We have verified the position from both the sides. The counsel for the appellant submits that no notice under section 8(4) has been received. In case the respondent chooses to issue such a notice, a copy of the notice may also

¶10

FPA-PMLA-1593/PTN/2016

¶11

Page 1 of 2

¶12

be served to the counsel for the appellant who may take necessary steps for pressing the said prayer at that point of time. We may clarify that such prayer will be decided on merit.

¶13

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶14

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶15

(B.K. Bansal) Member

¶16

New Delhi, 27^th April, 2017.

¶17

‘K’

¶18

FPA-PMLA-1593/PTN/2016

¶19

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1593/ PTN/2016 of Smt. Sindhu Devi v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-1593/ PTN/2016 of Smt. Sindhu Devi v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases