FPA-PMLA-1590/ Mum /2016 of Tejal Kumar Panchal v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
The bench listed the application for condonation of delay for hearing on 4th October, 2017, noting the respondent
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3015/MUM/2016 (COD) MP-PMLA-3016/ MUM /2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1590/ MUM /2016
Tejal Kumar Panchal … Appellant
Versus The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 17.07.2017
MP-PMLA-3015/MUM/2016
The reply has not been filed in the application for condonation of delay. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that due to onerous, department has prepared the reply in the main appeal as well as in the application for Condonation of Delay.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tejal Kumar Panchal
- respondent
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · July
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1590/ MUM /2016
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1
- Order 2 — this page
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court