Ad interim order in a PMLA appeal against an attachment order, adjourning the matter pending confirmation and notification as per the schedule. The order is purely procedural and does not decide the substantive merits of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3001/HYD/2016 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3000/HYD/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1583/ HYD/2016
M/s Capstone Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director … Respondent Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 11.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1583/HYD/2016
Re-notify on 21st August, 2017 at 2:30 p.m.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 11th August, 2017 ‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1583/HYD/2016
Page 1 of 1
M/s Capstone Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
