An interim order extending time for filing a reply in a prevention of money laundering matter, listing the case for hearing, and continuing an interim order.
Extension of two weeks for filing reply with advance copy shared; interim order continued till next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2987/HYD/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1573/HYD/2016
Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy
… Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri K.V. Viswanathan, Sr. Advocate with Shri Raghenth Basant, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
07.03.2017
MP-PMLA-2987/HYD/2016 (Stay)
Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate learned counsel for the respondent seeks two weeks more time to file the reply. Let the same be filed within two weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 2nd May, 2017.
Interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava)
Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi,
07th March, 2017
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1573/HYD/2016
Page 1 of 1
Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
