Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1562/ PTN/2016 of Shri Sanoj Yadav v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

ATFP27 Apr 2017FPA-PMLA-1562/ PTN/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal reviewed pleadings where the appellant claimed no receipt of notice under Section 8(4) of the PMLA. It directed parties to file written synopses and clarified that the pending interim prayer will be decided on merits if notice is issued.

What did the court decide?

Parties granted six weeks to file written synopses. Pending interim prayer to be decided on merits upon receipt of any Section 8(4) notice.

FPA-PMLA-1562/ PTN/2016 of Shri Sanoj Yadav v/s The Deputy… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-2945/PTN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1562/ PTN/2016 Shri Sanoj Yadav … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the appellant	: Shri Rajesh Mahale, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam for Mr. Shijan C. George, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER
SHRI B.K. BANSAL	: MEMBER

¶5

ORDER 27.04.2017

¶6

FPA-PMLA-1562/ PTN/2016

¶7

Rejoinder has not been filed by the counsel for the appellant. The counsel for the appellant submits that the same is not necessary. Thus the pleadings are complete. Both the parties are given six weeks time to file the written synopsis.

¶8

List on 15^th September, 2017.

¶9

The learned counsel for the appellant is pressing for interim order for which the separate MP 3019/2016 has been filed. We have verified the position from both the sides. The counsel for the appellant submits that no notice under section 8(4) has been received. In case the respondent chooses to issue such a notice, a copy of the notice may also

¶10

FPA-PMLA-1562/PTN/2016

¶11

Page 1 of 2

¶12

be served to the counsel for the appellant who may take necessary steps for pressing the said prayer at that point of time. We may clarify that such prayer will be decided on merit.

¶13

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶14

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶15

(B.K. Bansal) Member

¶16

New Delhi, 27^th April, 2017.

¶17

‘K’

¶18

FPA-PMLA-1562/PTN/2016

¶19

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1562/ PTN/2016 of Shri Sanoj Yadav v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1562/ PTN/2016 of Shri Sanoj Yadav v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases