The Appellate Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the appellant's application within six weeks with advanced copy and listed the matter for hearing on December 1, 2017.
Grant of six weeks to the respondent for filing the reply with advance copy to appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2956/DLI/2016 (U.A.) MP-PMLA-2957/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1561/DLI/2016
Manish Jain
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mohd. Talha, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 06.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1561/DLI/2016
Reply has not been filed. Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate submits that he has been engaged very recently, he may be granted six weeks time. Let the same be done within six weeks as last opportunity with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder
four weeks thereafter.
List on 1st December, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 6th July, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1561/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 2
FPA-PMLA-1561/DLI/2016 Page 2 of 2
Manish Jain
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
