The Appellate Tribunal listed the Revenue Recovery Proceedings filed by the appellant against the respondent and granted time for the appellant to file a rejoinder in reply to the respondent's filing.
Proceedings listed for the next date; four weeks time granted to appellant to file rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1554/DLI/2016
Bank of Baroda … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. Karan Khana, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 12.05.2017
FPA-PMLA-1554/DLI/2016
Reply has been filed by the respondent. The counsel for the appellant
is granted four weeks time to file the rejoinder.
List on 28th September, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 12th May, 2017 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1554/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
Bank of Baroda
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
