The Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for hearing and allowed the appellant time to file a rejoinder within four weeks, subjecting the matter to a future date for further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1551/DLI/2016
State Bank of Hyderabad … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Mr Karan Khanna, Advocate Ms Asmita Kumari Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
| ORDER |
|---|
| 23.02.2017 |
FPA-PMLA-1551/DLI/2016
Reply has been filed. Copy of the same has been given to the
counsel for the appellant, who seeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 12th May, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 23rd February, 2017 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1551/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
State Bank of Hyderabad
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
B.K. BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
