FPA-PMLA-1543/BNG/2016 of Sri Ananth Kumar v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Case brief
What is this about?
Sri Ananth Kumar V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2901-BNG-2016 FPA-PMLA-1543/BNG/2016 Sri Ananth Kumar … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Sweety Manchanda and Sh. Pujari Advocates for Sh. R.V. Naik, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 27.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1543/BNG/2016
Counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent is not available in the file. However, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the same has been filed on 23rd May, 2016. He will check in the registry that the same is placed on record otherwise he will file the photocopies of the same. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks four weeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the respondent.
Both the parties will also file the written synopsis on or before the next date of hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sh. R.V. Naik
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court