The Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal and a pending fresh application regarding possession of attached property for hearing on 19 January 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3963/IDR/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-2810/IDR/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1487/IDR/2016 Dr. Vinod Bhandari … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Indore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 01.11.2017
MP-PMLA-3963/IDR/2017 (Misc.) & FPA-PMLA-1487/IDR/2016
Fresh application has been filed. For taking that the possession of the property attached. Copy has been served to Mr. Vikas Garg. He seeks four weeks time to file the reply. Let the same be done within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter. Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate states that he will also verify from the department as to whether actual possession has been taken or not. In the main appeal rejoinder has been filed by the appellant.
Learned counsel for the appellant states that possession has been taken. Therefore, the fresh application has been filed.
FPA-PMLA-1487/IDR/2016
Page 1 of 2
List the appeal and pending application on 19th January, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra)
Member
New Delhi,
01st November, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1487/IDR/2016
Page 2 of 2
Dr. Vinod Bhandari
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Indore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
