Listing order in a money-laundering stay proceeding where the reply to the appellant was not filed, reply time closed, list fixed, and interim order extended till the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2828/BNG/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1486/BNG/2016
Navroze Homi Irani & Anr … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Anshuman Swamy, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri A.K Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 21.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-1486/BNG/2016
The reply has not been filed by the learned counsel for the
respondent. Right to file the reply is closed.
List on 27th September, 2017.
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis on or
before the next date.
Interim order already passed on 24th October, 2016 to continue till
the next date.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 21st April, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1492/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Navroze Homi Irani & Anr
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
B. K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
