The Tribunal allowed an interim stay pending disposal of applications. Respondent failed to file a reply. Matter listed for final hearing.
Direction to file reply; interim stay ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2783/BNG/2016 (Stay)
& FPA-PMLA-1473/BNG/2016 Smt. R. Yureka … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri S.S. Mishra, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
17.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-1473/BNG/2016 & MP-PMLA-2783/BNG/2016 (Stay)
Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity is allowed to file the
same within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the
appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 21st April, 2017.
Interim order to continue till further order.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 17th February, 2017 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1473/BNG/2016
Page 1 of 1
Smt. R. Yureka
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
