Interim order continuing the appeal with Registry to file missed reply; rejoinder to be filed within four weeks; list fixed for November 16, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2768/GHY/2016 FPA-PMLA-1459/GHY/2016 Sunil Datt Yadav & Anr. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Guwahati … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Ashish Batra, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
17.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1459/GHY/2016
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. The Learned Counsel submits that the reply is ready and he would be filing the same in the registry during the course of the day. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to file the rejoinder. Rejoinder be filed within four weeks’ time. Interim order to continue.
List the appeal on 16th November, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 17th July, 2017
M
FPA-PMLA-1459/GHY/2016
Page 1 of 1
Sunil Datt Yadav & Anr.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Guwahati
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
