No one appeared on behalf of the appellant in this appeal filed under the PMLA. The reply was admitted and the rejoinder was closed. The matter was listed for hearing.
In an appeal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, no representative appeared for the appellant. The reply was filed and the right to file a rejoinder was closed. The matter was listed for future hearing on 18th January 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1436/JP/2016
Aruna Sharma & Anr. … Appellants/Applicants Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
… Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 02.11.2017
FPA-PMLA-1436/JP/2016
No one appear on behalf of the appellant.
Reply has been filed. Rejoinder has not been filed. Right to file the rejoinder is closed.
List on 18th January, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 2nd November, 2017
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1436/JP/2016
Page 1 of 1
Aruna Sharma & Anr.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
