This order addresses procedural and listing matters. No one appeared for respondents 2, 5, and later 2, 3, and 4, who were proceeded ex parte. Posted a hearing for 17th April 2017 and granted the appellant four weeks more to file a reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1433/CHN/2016 Central Bank of India … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Appellant/Applicant
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Gaurav Khaitan, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : None |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 30.01.2017
FPA-PMLA-1433/CHN/2016
The impugned order was passed. The affidavit of service has been filed. It appears from the said affidavit that the Respondent No. 2 & 5 has been served. No one appears on their behalf, they are proceeded ex parte. On appellant taking necessary steps with regard to service the respondent No. 2, 3 & 4 notice be issued to these respondents for the hearing on 17th April, 2017.
In the meanwhile, the respondent No. 1 is granted four weeks more time to file the reply. Let the reply be served to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder by the date of hearing as may be fixed on 17th April, 2017.
FPA-PMLA-1433/CHN/2016
Page 1 of 2
List on 17th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 30th January, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1433/CHN/2016
Page 2 of 2
Central Bank of India
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
