Interim order allowing the appellant two weeks to serve un-impugned respondents and requesting the respondent to file a reply for rejoinder.
Time granted for service; reply filed for rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1432/CHN/2016
Central Bank of India … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri S.C. Gupta, Advocate For the respondent : Sh. Niraj Atri, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 17.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-1432/CHN/2016
The counsel for the appellant submits that the Respondents- 3, 4, 6 and 7 are not served. Despite best effort, made by the appellant, he seeks some time to take appropriate steps to serve the respondents by way of publication at the last address available to the Bench. Let the same be done within two weeks.
In the meanwhile the respondent-1 will supply the copy of the reply to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 17th July, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 17th April, 2017. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1432/CHN/2016
Page 1 of 1
Central Bank of India
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
