The Tribunal granted an opportunity to file a reply in an appeal under PMLA, directed witnesses to file written synopses, and listed the appeal for a final hearing.
Final hearing day fixed; directions for filing reply and written synopsis on or before the next date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1431/MUM/2016
Amtendu Pandey … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri S.K. Das, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana Advocate for Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 13.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-1431/MUM/2016
Reply has not been filed. Last opportunity is granted to file the
reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List the appeal for final hearing on 25th April, 2017.
Both the parties are directed to file their written synopsis on or
before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 13th February, 2017 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1431/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
Amtendu Pandey
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
