An adjournment order in a money laundering appeal where time is granted to file a rejoinder as the reply was not on record. No substantive legal decision was rendered in this order.
Four weeks time granted to file the rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1428/COCHIN/2016
Shri Suresh & Anr.
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri T.K. Babu, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
21.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1428/COCHIN/2016
Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate says that reply has been filed in the Registry. However, same is not on record. He will verify in the Registry and see that the same is placed on record. In the meanwhile, four weeks time is granted to file the rejoinder.
List on 14th August, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 21th March, 2017 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1428/COCHIN/2016
Page 1 of 1
Shri Suresh & Anr.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
Justice Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
