The Appellate Tribunal ruled on a money laundering matter. Counsel for the appellant stated acquittal from the scheduled offence and sought to allow prayers. The respondent requested time for instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2645/DLI/2016 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1413/DLI/2016
Smt. Sharda Maheshwari … Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Aditya Chaudhary, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 12.01.2017
MP-PMLA-2645/DLI/2016 (COD) & FPA-PMLA-1413/DLI/2016
Shri Aditya Chaudhary, learned counsel for the appellant states
that the appellant has been acquitted from the scheduled offence, therefore, the prayer made in the appeal and application may be allowed. Shri Atul Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent seeks some time to take the instructions.
List on 2nd February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 12th January, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1413/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
Smt. Sharda Maheshwari
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
