Listing order where respondent counsel seeks time for instructions in money laundering appeals following the appellant's acquittal in the scheduled offense.
Order fixing a date for hearing appeals filed by an appellant acquitted of the scheduled offense, noting the respondent sought additional time for instructions. No substantive decision rendered in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2644/DLI/2016 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1412/DLI/2016
A.K. Maheshwari
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri R.K. Handoo, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 12.01.2017
MP-PMLA-2644/DLI/2016 (COD) & FPA-PMLA-1412/DLI/2016
Shri R.K. Handoo, learned counsel for the appellant states that the
appellant has been acquitted from the scheduled offence, therefore, the prayer made in the appeal and application may be allowed. Shri Atul Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent seeks some time to take the instructions.
List on 2nd February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 12th January, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1412/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
A.K. Maheshwari
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
